![]() ![]() In response to Hunter Biden’s offer to testify publicly, the Republican chairmen of the committees said they would provide him that opportunity under the condition that he testify behind closed doors first. In letters to the chairmen, his legal team contended that the Republican-led committees would release excerpts of the closed-door testimony in small batches that lacked proper context in an effort to damage the president politically. Hunter Biden’s legal team had pushed back on the committee’s request to appear behind closed doors, saying their client was only willing to answer questions in a public setting. Biden’s flagrant defiance of the Committees’ deposition subpoenas - while choosing to appear nearby on the Capitol grounds to read a prepared statement on the same matters - is contemptuous, and he must be held accountable for his unlawful actions,” the reports read. ![]() On the day of the deposition, Hunter Biden held a press event in front of the Capitol but took no questions.Ĭomer and Jordan argue that his actions were unlawful and that he should be held accountable. But instead, he made no effort to comply with their request. They said he was presented with a subpoena requiring him to appear for a closed-door deposition and was provided an opportunity to work with them to find a time that would work best with his schedule. James Comer, R-Ky., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, outline their case for holding Hunter Biden in contempt. In their reports, the committee’s chairmen, Reps. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |